Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Open ; 10(12): e040200, 2020 12 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293311

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Survivors of acute pancreatitis (AP) have shorter overall survival and increased incidence of new-onset cardiovascular, respiratory, liver and renal disease, diabetes mellitus and cancer compared with the general population, but the mechanisms that explain this are yet to be elucidated. Our aim is to characterise the precise nature and extent of organ dysfunction following an episode of AP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an observational prospective cohort study in a single centre comprising a University hospital with an acute and emergency receiving unit and clinical research facility. Participants will be adult patient admitted with AP. Participants will undergo assessment at recruitment, 3 months and 3 years. At each time point, multiple biochemical and/or physiological assessments to measure cardiovascular, respiratory, liver, renal and cognitive function, diabetes mellitus and quality of life. Recruitment was from 30 November 2017 to 31 May 2020; last follow-up measurements is due on 31 May 2023. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of new-onset type 3c diabetes mellitus during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include: quality of life analyses (SF-36, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index); montreal cognitive assessment; organ system physiological performance; multiomics predictors of AP severity, detection of premature cellular senescence. In a nested cohort within the main cohort, individuals may also consent to multiparameter MRI scan, echocardiography, pulmonary function testing, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and pulse-wave analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received the following approvals: UK IRAS Number 178615; South-east Scotland Research Ethics Committee number 16/SS/0065. Results will be made available to AP survivors, caregivers, funders and other researchers. Publications will be open-access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03342716) and ISRCTN50581876; Pre-results.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pancreatite , Doença Aguda , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , SARS-CoV-2 , Escócia
2.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0238568, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264327

RESUMO

The risk of poor post-operative outcome and the benefits of surgical resection as a curative therapy require careful assessment by the clinical care team for patients with primary and secondary liver cancer. Advances in surgical techniques have improved patient outcomes but identifying which individual patients are at greatest risk of poor post-operative liver performance remains a challenge. Here we report results from a multicentre observational clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03213314) which aimed to inform personalised pre-operative risk assessment in liver cancer surgery by evaluating liver health using quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We combined estimation of future liver remnant (FLR) volume with corrected T1 (cT1) of the liver parenchyma as a representation of liver health in 143 patients prior to treatment. Patients with an elevated preoperative liver cT1, indicative of fibroinflammation, had a longer post-operative hospital stay compared to those with a cT1 within the normal range (6.5 vs 5 days; p = 0.0053). A composite score combining FLR and cT1 predicted poor liver performance in the 5 days immediately following surgery (AUROC = 0.78). Furthermore, this composite score correlated with the regenerative performance of the liver in the 3 months following resection. This study highlights the utility of quantitative MRI for identifying patients at increased risk of poor post-operative liver performance and a longer stay in hospital. This approach has the potential to inform the assessment of individualised patient risk as part of the clinical decision-making process for liver cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Hepatectomia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Regeneração Hepática , Fígado/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatologia , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Colangiocarcinoma/fisiopatologia , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Fígado/patologia , Hepatopatias/complicações , Hepatopatias/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Veia Porta , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...